Monday, October 24th, 2016

Socialized Medicine and Harm Reduction for the Rest of Us


One of the dangers of socialized medicine is that population health and minimizing public health care costs always trump what’s best for individual patients.

As part of its harm reduction program the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority is now handing out crack pipe kits to drug addicts in Vancouver. This is in addition to funding and operating a supervised injection facility for drug addicts. Insite costs around $3 million a year and provides drug addicts with clean needles and other supplies for injecting their drugs all under the guise of a harm reduction program aimed at – you guessed it – improving population health and minimizing public health care costs.

Supporters of Insite claim it reduces the number of deaths by drug overdose and the transmission of certain diseases. That may sound good for population health statistics, but what about the individual health of these drug addicts? Prolonged drug use impacts the brain and body and can lead to various chronic conditions, heart disease, strokes and organ failure. I wonder what family members and former employers of these individuals have to say about the impacts of prolonged drug use on quality of life?

How did such a place come to be? In 2003 the facility received an exemption from Canada’s federal drug law, the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, for the purpose of scientific research. Drug addicts serving as research subjects explains the avid support Insite receives from the academic and research community.

Supporters of Insite say that we must take care of the needs of the most vulnerable in our society. A line often used to try and guilt us into embracing ideas like this one that serves to transfer all personal responsibility for using drugs from the drug addicts themselves on to the rest of us. If the family members or friends of a drug addict were providing them with needles for injecting drugs or pipes for smoking crack wouldn’t they be called enablers?

Since drug addicts face no legal consequences for their drug use at Insite and no financial consequences for the services provided to them at this facility they really have no incentive to stop using drugs. How can a drug addict get clean without quitting drugs? How many drug addicts have been cured of their drug addiction through Insite?

Last September a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada mandated Insite’s continued exemption from the federal drug law. However, the original exemption only allows for injecting drugs not inhaling them so Insite’s new inhalation room for crack addicts will have to stay empty for now.

What’s next? Will the government start providing the drugs to drug addicts as part of its harm reduction model? It’s already happening under the banner of scientific research. Enrollment for the latest study started on December 19, 2011.

A few weeks ago the public health director in Montreal and the provincial minister of health put out the call for new safe injection sites in Quebec as a harm reduction measure aimed at improving population health and minimizing public health care costs.

Another danger of socialized medicine is that it makes all of us more vulnerable. I’d like to recommend a harm reduction measure for the law-abiding, taxpaying citizens footing the bills for safe injection sites and crack pipe kits – just say NO!



7 Responses to “Socialized Medicine and Harm Reduction for the Rest of Us”
  1. RN says:

    Your readers might be interested in the latest pilot project/UVic study underway in Vancouver, BC:

    “Pilot program gives free alcohol to alcoholics in hopes of turning their lives around”
    Global News

    “Free alcohol for alcoholics in Vancouver harm-reduction project”
    VANCOUVER/CKNW(AM980), By Charmaine de Silva

  2. Fiona McMurran says:

    I’m surprised that this website is providing a forum for such tired old right-wing rhetoric. That’s not to say that the question of the benefits of safe-injection sites should not be questioned, but this writer’s concerns have everything to do with politics, and nothing to do with patients. “Just say NO!” ? Hey, now why didn’t we all think of that?!?

  3. Kartik says:

    Someone I know on Facebook said he has no problem paying for this because it’ll help the addicts eventually AND it’ll allow them to preserve their money for important items…
    Look it’s his opinion but I’d rather taxes weren’t involved…

  4. Kartik says:

    I thought the point of this clinic is to get addicts off of crack..

Speak Your Mind

I have read, understood, and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy of The Patient Factor website, and I am posting this content in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in the Terms of Service. I accept full responsibility for any content I post, and hereby consent to the publication of this content and its disclosure to the public on The Patient Factor website.

webdesign by Linda Caroll Copyright © 2009 Chapman Communication Sitemap / Privacy / Terms of Use
Canadian Health Care; News, Views and Commentary