Monday, October 24th, 2016

Saskatchewan Government Denies Patient Out-of-Country Coverage for Medically Necessary Surgery


What if a medical product that was supposed to help your condition ended up causing you harm? In 2010 Health Canada issued an advisory to hospitals and doctors warning about serious post-operative complications with transvaginal mesh. This information came too late for Stephanie Brad, a Saskatchewan woman who received a transvaginal mesh implant in 2006 to help with bladder leakage. Since then Stephanie has suffered through pain, infections, and additional surgeries to repair internal injuries caused by eroding mesh.

In 2012 Stephanie learned about a skillful surgeon in California whose technique for complete mesh removal has helped hundreds of women. Despite a referral from her specialist, the Saskatchewan government has refused to provide her with coverage for out-of-country medical services.

Last month Stephanie invited me along to an appointment with her Urologist to see how difficult it is to get approval for out-of-country care.

On the day of her appointment the waiting room is packed. An inner door opens and Stephanie’s name is called. We enter her Urologist’s office and both take a seat. I’m impressed by Stephanie’s composure throughout the conversation with her doctor. She’s done research, compiled facts and has a packet of information containing copies of letters and supporting documents. She is what I call an informed patient. Her doctor agrees that surgery for complete mesh removal is in Stephanie’s best interest. He is supportive of her leaving the country to access the surgeon of her choice. He talks about his phone calls to the Ministry of Health regarding her case. Then he tells her what I already know to be true – the final decision rests with the government. What about the decisions made by Stephanie and her doctor? Under a single-payer health care system the government decides the quality and quantity of medical services you receive.

Ten days after her doctor’s appointment the Saskatchewan government sent a final decision letter to Stephanie. The government has denied her out-of-country coverage for a surgery estimated to cost $30,000 US.  The government claims there are doctors in Canada who can do mesh removal surgery. I’m sure surgery is cheaper in Canada due to price controls, but as a patient wanting the best chance for improved health and quality of life I don’t want the cheapest care I want the best care. Like Stephanie, I want the freedom to choose the surgeon who is right for me.

What is the next step available to Stephanie? Patients who are denied out-of-country coverage can appeal to the government’s Health Services Review Committee. Members of this committee review the government’s decision to make sure it followed legislation and its own policies and guidelines. If the Health Services Review Committee denies your application for appeal then you can lodge a complaint with the provincial ombudsman. The office of the Ombudsman teaches “The Fine Art of Fairness” to government employees to help them with their decision-making. It can review the “fairness” of the government’s decision and make recommendations.

Under a single-payer health care system it’s politicians and health care bureaucrats who decide what constitutes “need”, “medically necessary” services, “reasonable access”, and “fairness”. This is why there is little rhyme or reason as to which patients receive out-of-country coverage for medical services. What about the Saskatchewan government’s promise of putting patients first? What about its promise of patient-centered care? Those are political promises, not reality.

Just ask Stephanie Brad.




5 Responses to “Saskatchewan Government Denies Patient Out-of-Country Coverage for Medically Necessary Surgery”
  1. Colleen says:

    Living in pain and discomfort is hard and my heart goes out to Ms Brad. You wrote that “Like Stephanie, I want the freedom to choose the surgeon who is right for me.” Canadians need a referral to a surgeon by their family physician or by a specialist like Ms Brad’s urologist. The government has nothing to do with that – and patients don’t need prior approval for funding for a medically necessary procedure. It sounds like the Saskatchewan government is prepared to pay for a Canadian surgeon, So I’m confused about this situation. Why doesn’t Ms Bard ask her urologist to refer her to a Canadian surgeon? If the she’s referred to has a long wait list she can ask to be referred to someone else.

    Canadians are able to choose their own doctors – as long as the doctor is in Canada. Some people might prefer to go outside the country and they, too, are free to do so as long as they pay format themselves.

    • admin says:

      Under a single-payer health care system government controls the patient-doctor relationship and rations medically necessary services. This is why patients are on waiting lists and doctors are allocated a limited number of OR hours and surgeries (aka prior approval for funding of medically necessary services). The Surgery Center of Oklahoma is a great example of free market health care. Prices for medical services are listed on their website and patients paying directly for their own medical services don’t need a referral from a family doctor for access to a surgeon.

      Forcing Canadian patients to pay for a publicly-funded health care system and then telling them take what you get or leave the country is unfair.

  2. Mari says:

    In a case where health Canada has issued an advisory I’m sorry but I strongly believe that the company who made the mesh and health Canada have an obligation to pay for the treatment!
    Yes there may be doctors in Canada capable of doing the surgery but if there is a specialist that has remarkable outcomes, the patient should be able to go with whom ever make her feel most comfortable and health Canada should back her up as this surgery she received should have never been released in the first place if proper inspections and studies were done.

  3. Colleen says:

    Actually the transvaginal mesh is a great example of free market health care.

    In any event, I agree with Mari: there are class action lawsuits against the manufacturers of this device but that is a very unfair way for women who had the implants to achieve any form of justice or compensation for their pain and suffering. Health Canada should not have licensed the manufacturers and should have stepped up to the plate to ensure there was support for these women, including compensation from the device makers without going through lengthy court battles, access to information and counselling.

    In addition, the fact that women have had and continue to have so few options to address pelvic prolapse is a reflection of market failure.

    • admin says:

      In a free market, patients would have the freedom to choose and purchase medical products. Innovation would flourish with companies competing to bring better products to the market.

Speak Your Mind

I have read, understood, and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy of The Patient Factor website, and I am posting this content in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in the Terms of Service. I accept full responsibility for any content I post, and hereby consent to the publication of this content and its disclosure to the public on The Patient Factor website.

webdesign by Linda Caroll Copyright © 2009 Chapman Communication Sitemap / Privacy / Terms of Use
Canadian Health Care; News, Views and Commentary